What is real now? We do not know. Chatters and agencies, as well as some models have used AI not to edit, but to create full set of photoshoots or short videos of existing models to sell the content to the naive fans who pay, while there is no actual content shot. We are witnessing the end of big boobs modeling as we know it.
Instagram, X, tiktok or reddit feature daily photos of videos that are altered materially or 100% generated by AI. Now we find many girls who do not exist. Before we complained about extreme photoshop and filters, now we see fake models and photos.
This trend is used by established models and amateurs. This is the last year MBR contest will feature so many girls. I think it is ok to use AI to edit some lighting errors, smooth the face or fix details, but I would not be agreeing to create entire sets.
Nowadays with AI some fans have created very credible porn videos of our favorite models and Golden Era girls. Now some girls who suck dick in private may do it with the big spenders and if ever leaked, they could claim it is AI.
Someone made a Tessa AI BJ. Looks fake but, many people get more entertained by AI rather than current girls content.
The phenomenon is not limited to NSFW content. Politics, aliens, natural disasters, sports, you name it. Now we cannot even trust our own eyes.
And to top it up, the “experts” claim Ai will destroy us. Their plan? Things may look out of control, so eventually after some “false flag cyber attack” on a Friday the internet as we know it will stop. Big Brother may “save us” and decide what is real and what is not. Let’s enjoy the last few months or years.
Boobsrealm will continue releasing material shot between 2019 and 2026, with the final upcoming 3 more shoots happening in the next 4 months. All content on the Boobsrealm LF or OF will be real. The last stand against chatters, fake models and all the current trend. As of 2026 only Boobsrealm, Daktari and Pinupfiles are left standing.
45% Discount on the Boobsrealm Onlyfans. Callista Nox, Sweet Melon, Pepper MILF, Mia Mellycious debuting in the next 2 months.
BoobsRealm 45% Discount
Below Tori Trevino, a famous ai generated girl who looks very real
That cock is almost identical to mine. Hopefully it’s a sign, lol.
Of all the ridiculous posts you’ve made, this is the most ridiculous.
Video GenAI is great for disrupting this industry exactly because it allows many more people to create high-quality content of high-quality models in more interesting locations than “random forgettable indoor room”.
A video is actually human-shot? Who cares? An animated movie isn’t real, but some of us enjoy them anyway.
An amateur video is genuinely shot? Who cares?
Here are some wonderful possibilities GenAI enables:
Extending Daktari videos to full nudity, whether solo, or G/G.
Replacing any ugly blonde plastic bimbo with Vixen Virago instead, including in the kinds of videos no longer even made.
Pairing up models from different eras making a soft G/G video together, such as Yulia Nova with Luna Amor.
Etc. etc.
And if there’s a large supply of this, then there will be much less demand for mediocre-looking models as well, which would be a big advantage.
In short, AI is *great*, because it’ll really raise the bar for what could be, and let a lot more imagination be used to make content we’ve never seen before.
This shows you don’t even like women, just some imagination of them. I honestly cannot wrap my head around somebody being so pathetic to openly admit how much of a loser he is. You have to be very ugly/degenerate genetically to make statements like this. You’re probably like 5’3″ and morbidly obese. Comparing movies to potential dating partners is just next level degenerate virgin low IQ logic. If I tried to make a post as dumb as yours, I still wouldn’t succeed. That takes the 60 IQ.
If you think AI or anime look like VV, then I don’t know what to tell you. Clearly, you’re not into big tits, that would imply you’re a heterosexual man whos into women. You’re into anime girls. Why would any woman care what you’re into? You’re the definition of a nobody loser. No half-decent human being would ever type out the trash you did.
Your comment is silly on multiple levels.
Let’s break it down.
1) That you feel so compelled to associate “adult content creator” with “potential dating partner” is peculiar, shall we say. What next, you’ll consider Sydney Sweeney or Margot Robbie a “potential dating partner” for you?
2) My statement on animation is just as applicable to live-action IPs. Everyone knows certain ideas/concepts are purely fantastical (lightsabers, wizards, etc.), but that hasn’t stopped various fantastical IPs from achieving tremendous commercial success at their cultural height.
3) “Look at this LOSER!” has been the rallying cry of a bunch of individuals that precipitated the decline of entertainment across multiple industries. The horrendous drop in quality from the involvement of people with your exact sentiment speaks for itself. The decline of shows/movies, video games, and yes, even glamor modeling is self-evident for those of us with longer memories, such as the blog owner (golden era to OF era).
4) Gorgeous women with ideal physiques are often basic table stakes for commercial success these days, while the opposite is a massive red flag that can often result in commercial failure. See: Sydney Sweeney.
5) Are you really calling someone a chud in all but name here, of all places?
In conclusion, none of this has anything to do with anybody’s view of women, but for those of you who wonder why the Golden Era is but a memory instead of the status quo, I present exhibit A.
I dislike morphs, artificial women, AI-generated women and anime/manga porn. I guess it’s a personal matter, as it turns me on to think that somewhere, there is a real woman like the one I am seeing. I dislike seeing fantasy porn.
I guess that the opposite view is equally respectable. But, for me, it’s a turn-off. It’s like watching a porn scene of a dead pornstar… I just don’t get aroused by it, it’s a nagging sensation. Like feeling bad or disrespectful. A dead person is supposed to make you sad, not excited. That’s my opinion, of course.
I completely agree. Living, breathing, flesh and blood women only please.
You clearly don’t understand what consent is and believe you can just use someone’s likeness as you please. There are no regulations or restrictions on ai yet and frankly there should be because the people using it have no regard with the potential damages they create not just limited to the digital world
Well, if you must be spoonfed every logical consequence of GenAI, I’ll oblige.
It would be trivial to describe what sort of preferences you have for a completely fictional model and iterate on that design.
1) “I have a preference for <> models. I have a preference for long, dark hair. Please generate me a few synthetic fictional models.”
2) Please make her hips slightly slimmer, and her hair slightly longer.
3) Please make her eyes slightly wider, and her nose slightly narrower. Please make her lips slightly less full.
Done. Now you can use this model in any setting of your choice. The beach, a forest, etc.
Yes but you understand its not real right?
You understand the effects?
What if it’s the model herself prompting the AI software trained on her own work, doing video shoots that she otherwise would not be able to do, releasing the videos herself? Imagine a golden era model being able to perform choreographed dances or gymnastics she never learned, in a fictional setting. Would you complain about that, just because it didn’t happen in real life, even if it looks lifelike?
And at some point, it will look real enough. AI is already able to do photorealistic images. One of the last barriers is video generation.
And when the bar for glamor nude videos is “beautiful model in a nondescript room or next to a pool, or maybe the beach”, the bar is set very, very low.
Maybe some day you will understand
I understand you’re trying to shoo out the last models of the golden era, while promoting amateur OF and camsloppers.
When the constraints of “100% real” mean the same short camslop in boring places with boring videos, then AI can offer vastly better alternatives by training on a professional model’s entire history of pictures and videos, and therefore, letting a fan create a new model that will generate galleries and videos she could never shoot, prompt the machine, send the videos *to* the model, and let make money off of that.
Would you really begrudge that to someone?
I’d much rather have a great real model in a fake video than a fake model in a trash real video.
Let her* make money off of that.
The tech companies are going to lay you lmao.
I want real content, people like you are the problem in the world rn.
Fuckin slop is everywhere, go touch grass or learn a real skill.
I bet you are one of those people that studies show give up after 10m cause slop has rotted your brain so bad
Spoken like someone who has never seen good AI work, which already exists; how sad for you (and yes, I touch grass).
In actuality, it’s the “real” content that’s slop–constant selfie or camslop with a five minute video in a single pose. Studio-quality, 20-minute long videos of good models are practically nonexistent anymore. When simps pay hundreds of dollars for one ten minute custom (which can be the equivalent of ten trips to the cinema), that means the field is ripe for disruption from competition.
These responses sound AI generated too.
Have an original thought lmao.
What is a great me to have a successfull date with a busty woman?
I think the point he is making is he wants “genuine” content, and he feels fooled by AI. I would say that genuine is somewhat irrelevant beyond what we experience as genuine. None of us will ever meet any of these girls. For all we care, they could be fake or real as long as we can reasonably pretend that there is some universe in which we could meet them. Perhaps, for those who feel that this fantasy of reality is broken, AI is a problem. In the near future, it will be completely impossible to tell reality from fake. At that point, perhaps we will have to re-evaluate the endeavor of looking at naked girls online.
> he wants “genuine” content, and he feels fooled by AI.
He already disqualifies genuine content by stating that it wasn’t shot the year it was released in, while penalizing active models it pertains to by putting them in the Farewell Group in his sham contest. Will models need to livestream (yay, amateur camslop) or hold a date-of-shoot sign at the beginning of their shoots just to convince him? Please.
> None of us will ever meet any of these girls. For all we care, they could be fake or real as long as we can reasonably pretend that there is some universe in which we could meet them. Perhaps, for those who feel that this fantasy of reality is broken, AI is a problem.
I would suggest you to read about the dark side of Japan’s idol culture with this line of thinking, as it can get incredibly toxic. In fact, I’d hope every model be able to have a vibrant and happy personal life so that she *doesn’t* have the capacity to interact with fans.
> In the near future, it will be completely impossible to tell reality from fake. At that point, perhaps we will have to re-evaluate the endeavor of looking at naked girls online..
I view it as another form of created entertainment, with zero expectation of interacting with the model, especially when they set a precedent of practically not interacting with comments on social media, let alone any place else.
Because its about the best busty models in the year. Not who you like who happens to be alive on plant earth
On the one hand, a professional and exceptionally beautiful model that released 8 long-form studio videos over the course of the year, in addition to whatever other material on her OF (even if it’s dull). Put into the farewell group.
On the other hand, an amateur pornstar with Miss Frizzle’s hairstyle, and a social media tease influencer with a few titty GIFs. Both given byes.
Is this a bad joke?
This is EXACTLY why GenAI is good. So that if we have a preference for one type of particular model that does high-quality studio work, we can use GenAI to create something similar, instead of needing to settle for laughably overpriced “spicy” clips from social media influencers that are nothing in comparison with the studio work released over the past couple of decades. That GenAI work would be much better than anything most OF/camsloppers produce.
Certaines personnes ont créé des images de VV en pied à partir de photos et de vidéos qu’elle avait déjà publiées. VV a sorti pas mal de contenu, mais elle reste amateure dans sa façon de se filmer. Je trouve que c’était une bonne idée de reconstituer son apparence à partir des morceaux qu’elle avait déjà montrés. Je suis pas fan du contenu généré par l’IA, mais dans ce cas-ci, j’approuve. On a déjà vu son visage, sa poitrine, sa taille, ses fesses et ses jambes. Elle ne montre pas encore tout son corps d’un coup, mais on peut assembler les morceaux du casse-tête.
Some people made full-body images of VV using bits and pieces from photos and videos she’d already posted. She’s put out tons of footage, but she’s still pretty amateur when it comes to filming herself. I think putting those pieces together was a good call. I’m not a fan of AI stuff, but I’m cool with it in this case. We’ve already seen her face, chest, waist, butt, and legs. She still hasn’t shown her whole body in one shot, but you can piece it all together.
Great post Boobsrealm!
But the trained eye of Boobhounds can always tell the difference between fake and real. At least us veteran posters! We know!
Boob On,
Antonio
Why does it matter if you can tell or not?
Why not enjoy a synthetic creation as a creative work on its own merits? Why does it matter that there’s a random girl involved in it who you won’t ever meet?
This is a topic of much debate, and one we’ll never agree on. I remember that before your site was hacked, at the end of each post you had a list of your top 10 big-breasted girls. All those girls probably never did hardcore scenes, and I bet there are people who would pay to see them in a completely different setting than the one they usually filmed.
The list was: Katerina Hartlova, Merilyn Sakova, Lucie Wilde, Jenna Doll, Christy Marks, Tanya Song, Beth Lily, Karina Hart, Wendi White and Faith Nelson
I know Katerina, Lucie and Faith did hardcore.